Slovakia's music scene is relatively small. It's in fact just a small village. Only the lack of a good high-way system makes the country seem vast, where you travel almost a whole day to reach the other end (instead of just a couple of hours). One of the reasons, where one's focus on music is therefore determined to be confined to the capital itself - and thus even a smaller village.
Referring to my earlier articles, where I have encountered a detached type of provincialism in cultural life, something came along my path recently. Although I have marginally noticed this ensemble during one of my surf-sessions, it was only now, where I came across the "Baroque Quartett" from Žilina. My relatively intensive dealing with early music in Slovakia, caused my heart to skip a beat, as I realised why how come I haven't hear anything about this ensemble before. A recent concert in Trenčín would be able to give clarification.
Right at the onset, a serious concert-goer would maybe hear alarm horns sound: what in fact would a "baroque quartett" mean? Calling a group a quartett, would mostly imply perhaps a string quartett, yet the string quartetts became fashionable since the classical period... any other four-some group one would refer to as ensemble so-and-so. Nevertheless, this group is fixed and indeed officially called "Baroque Quartett Žilina". Well, baroque music can indeed be played in an almost unlimited variety of constellations, so let's see. First of all, it appears none of the instruments are period instruments - all modern. OK, I know of instances, where Jan Willem de Vriend also manages to create a fairly convincing baroque sound out of modern instruments. But this was a bit different: when seeing the programme, after Händel (pretty baroquish of course) there were works by Mozart (a bit classicism according to my books, but still ...) then 2 contemporaries and César Franck......... To be honest, a bit strange.
I shall not delve on the technical imperfections, the poor technique and not being able to understand any of the phrasing by the musicians (all professionals as I must believe). The only thing to say this big disappointing concert is this: If a professional musician, is not capable to do his job right - don't be a professional musician. Never mind that one doesn't want to agree with a bit more informed performance of pre-classical music. In that event, don't call your band a baroque quartett. It creates certain expectations. That's pretension to the fullest, and you make your audience look like a bunch of ignorant crowd. This is a 1970s Mantovani style kitsch. This was a level, one would not even send one's kids to as an educational concert. It is appalling and embarrassing. No wonder I never really encountered much of this ensemble, and perhaps better I never will.
MS
Referring to my earlier articles, where I have encountered a detached type of provincialism in cultural life, something came along my path recently. Although I have marginally noticed this ensemble during one of my surf-sessions, it was only now, where I came across the "Baroque Quartett" from Žilina. My relatively intensive dealing with early music in Slovakia, caused my heart to skip a beat, as I realised why how come I haven't hear anything about this ensemble before. A recent concert in Trenčín would be able to give clarification.
Right at the onset, a serious concert-goer would maybe hear alarm horns sound: what in fact would a "baroque quartett" mean? Calling a group a quartett, would mostly imply perhaps a string quartett, yet the string quartetts became fashionable since the classical period... any other four-some group one would refer to as ensemble so-and-so. Nevertheless, this group is fixed and indeed officially called "Baroque Quartett Žilina". Well, baroque music can indeed be played in an almost unlimited variety of constellations, so let's see. First of all, it appears none of the instruments are period instruments - all modern. OK, I know of instances, where Jan Willem de Vriend also manages to create a fairly convincing baroque sound out of modern instruments. But this was a bit different: when seeing the programme, after Händel (pretty baroquish of course) there were works by Mozart (a bit classicism according to my books, but still ...) then 2 contemporaries and César Franck......... To be honest, a bit strange.
I shall not delve on the technical imperfections, the poor technique and not being able to understand any of the phrasing by the musicians (all professionals as I must believe). The only thing to say this big disappointing concert is this: If a professional musician, is not capable to do his job right - don't be a professional musician. Never mind that one doesn't want to agree with a bit more informed performance of pre-classical music. In that event, don't call your band a baroque quartett. It creates certain expectations. That's pretension to the fullest, and you make your audience look like a bunch of ignorant crowd. This is a 1970s Mantovani style kitsch. This was a level, one would not even send one's kids to as an educational concert. It is appalling and embarrassing. No wonder I never really encountered much of this ensemble, and perhaps better I never will.
MS
1 comment:
To make clear - cast of instruments: voice (soprano), traverse flute, violoncello, piano...... with a big amount of overstatement one could see the attempt to seem like one dessus and continuo....but.....the choice of programm is just unbelievable.... what is the heritage of it? Are they joking about the audience (maybe expectating the audience does not understand what "baroque" means), or they want to say the baroque music is leak of music for such cast? I was just very very dissappointed and disgusted... the non-professional orchestra in the same town tries to make the baroque music in HIP way, have no problem with repertoir and no problem with attracting the audience.....how does it function in this country, in our minds?
zborka
Post a Comment